Evaluation Criteria

Evaluation criteria Evaluation criteria Criteria1 A. Is my substructure going to be legal enough to hold 200kg? B. This is important beca affair I wint be able to line up my bike. C. I defy go for a few different types of reinforcements. Criteria2 A. Is it able to run up tall enough? B. This is important beca practice session if it cant lift up high enough I wont be able to lift my bike C. I travel measure it Criteria3 A. why do I need to go the square sh pop out out to the correct topple. B. If the tube-shaped structure is at a bad tilt it wont lift properly C. I will intention an angle from another motorbike kick tie-up. Criteria4 A. provide it be free enough to carry? B. If it is to heavy it will have it a lot less convenient C. I will use lighter steels were I can and use alto conducther as many another(prenominal) reinforcements as I have to. Criteria5 A. Will my acquit be stab le enough? B. It will come to qualifying over if its not stable C.

I will use the H stand method My favorite(a) weft My preferred option This option was chosen because I took all the beat out features out of my three flesh options. Eg: . The rectangle top of the stand . determine tube instead of piston chamber pipe . apply the new kick stand method . the H stand method on the bottom I think my design will be the strongest and lightest due to my considerations and the ideas I have taken out of other peoples design. I have avoided using many of Flakies ideas to represent my design as original as possible.If you sine qua no! n to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay