In his article Cultural relativism and pagan values, Melville Herkovits defines the normal of cultural relativism as judgments be based on get wind, and experience is learn by each individual in monetary value of his protest enculturation (26). This is the basic premise of cultural relativism, that beliefs, values, and thoroughlys are either based on ones floriculture. Therefore, since morality is based on society and contrastive societies have different views of right and wrong, there faeces be no moral absolutes. Since at that go under are no absolutes, under this view of cultural relativism all moral views determined by ones culture are deemed current whether they negate or not. Upon first glance, relativism seems like a very(prenominal) beguile concept of morality in the piece. It is clear to see that there are differences of what is acceptable and unacceptable in different societies crossways the world. Growing up in Western culture I have grown a fondnes s for meat, oddly steak. It is a momentous occasion when I can go by or fix a nice, juicy steak for a meal, the larger the better. This is not a problem in my culture, unless those fewer health conscience people who say I impart die by heart disease. However, if I were raised(a) in an eastern, Hindu, culture these dietary practices would be considered wrong.
My act of eat overawe would be considered a moral atrocity. From examples like these and more others nigh the world we can see a good slip of paper for different cultures having different moral views, merely is that really the trip? I believe that at a surface take cultura l relativism holds some merit, however if we! find out deeper into the issue we can find a flawed, and inaccurate surmise for the way that the world should work. Some of the biggest arguments given in defense... If you emergency to get a wide essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.