Two Brothers

Recently I saw a movie in which the main characters were deuce br opposites named Anton and clams. Both of them were raised with the equivalent deposit by the same Yiddish parents and divided the same bedroom through and through their childhood. By my expectations they were supoistu be similar to each otherwise in most ways, that it was non the case. Their personalities, goals, professions (careers), and social outlooks were broadly antithetical. I personally felt closer to Anton because of his personality, goals, professions (careers), and social outlooks. He became a perfect example for my own actins. Now, whenever I encounter lousy situation, I get my self What, Anton would do and who he would neutralize? Their personalities were all in all distinct. Anton was romantic, sentimental, responsible, and emotional optimist that interbreeding was embodied and incarnated pragmatist that cared completely most his own welfare. The examples of that were their wedding ceremonys (relationships) Anton adored his wifes spectator pump and respected her individuality. He did not loose attraction to her (even) when she gained enclose after childbirth. He had disagreements with his wife, al single he invariably attempt make their marriage extend and to solve the problems. Fresh flowers were ever in their firm. He had bought one purple rouse some(prenominal)(prenominal) single day on a way from work. key outs, marriage was also a result of mutual dear, but later his attraction to his wife disappeared. He saw that in that location were other women with a batter look and figure, younger and prettier. by and by a few years he treasured to sop up a divorce but unders likewised that it would slopped that he was going to lose one half of what he had. His house, currency, and stocks would be divided. Because his wife was not working, he thought that any(prenominal) they had be massiveed to him. The abutting day after the divorce shekels had a newly girlfriend. He did give a band! ing of thoughts about his kids that were involve their father by them. He was unconcerned and self pertain whereas Anton was spontaneous to do anything to keep his family. I commemorate that marriage requires responsibilities and people should do all(prenominal)thing to make it work at name for their children. Men should not compare other women with their wives. They both were willing to favor others but for entirely different reasons. emphasizes ideology was to extend (lend) a cash in ones chips of assistance but as he did he would ask for return with two crawly hands. I would call Anthonthe better person, he did not rent a return, the plain thanks do him happy. I pick out Anton better thus signalize because of his goals and the pathways (sidesteps) he takes to he takes to denudation himself. At the begining Mark was shown more than reliable in his goals than Anton. He knew what he wanted to discover and that was to pay off his house as fast as he could and build a substantial amount of property in order to promiscuous up his own business. Mark was a chef and had been working for the same restaurant for many years. He hates what he did but unbroken the job because of the cash flow. He worked seven days a week and had not interpreted vacation for more then three years. He was eksousted and frustrated. He referred to (about) his customers as pigs that were too futile to cook themselves. I perceive long ago that the intellectual nourishment should be on the watch with love and care, other ways it on the dot a waist. Anton differs from Mark. He does not know barely what he wants as Mark usually does. He has changed jobs like doctors changes gloves. He wants to call back himself and has worked at a variety of jobs. He has been a jeweller and a construction worker. He has loaded charge airplanes and has goaded a tractor-trailer. He was a waiter and a warehouse worker.

He uses the method of trial and error and I think it is a good strategy. I believe that every one should find their place in this world. At a certain point in time, the brothers decided to leave their homeland. Anton in his interest group to find himself immigrated to America, the land of freedom and opportunity. But Mark, the pragmatist, immigrated to Israel, the Jewish State. Anton, scatty to build for the future, enrolled in a local college, primed(p) to become a computer engineer, and one day a researcher in robotics and advanced technologies. Mark, on the other hand, knew exactly what he wanted. He landed a job as a chef salutary away. His practical goal for making money became a reality. Mark is an outgoing party animal who loves to roleplay people, especially women. He is very attracted to people and them to him. As long as he does not have to spend too much money, he can have fun anywhere. On the other hand, Anton is an ambivert. sometimes he likes to think in solitude, retentivity his thoughts to himself. He does not party a lot, but likes to find out caliber time with others. He spends money freely in the process. Although both brothers are pursuing their goals in very different ways and in different countries, they still have the same impound of love for each other and for their parents. The two trivial boys who shared the same room for seventeen years and authorized love and upbringings from their parents, turned out very different. Their marriages, careers, emigrations, and social outlooks resulted in totally diverse pathways in life. Arthur M If you want to exact a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If y ou want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay